![]() |
|
| Islington Liberal Democrats | <info@islington-libdems.org.uk> | 9th February 2010 |
Labour MP Emily Thornberry bails out of ANOTHER Heathrow vote12.57.42pm GMT Thu 26th Feb 2009
Opposition MPs forced a Liberal Democrat motion through the House of Commons this week demanding that the Government gets approval from Parliament before building any new major airports and runways. The Government has previously refused to share the decision-making concerning airport expansion. 22 rebel Labour MPs and Tory politicians joined the Liberal Democrats to push the motion through. The motion was proposed by Susan Kramer, Lib Dem MP for Richmond. But once again, Islington South and Finsbury MP Emily Thornberry refused to turn up. In January, Emily Thornberry refused to vote for a non-binding motion condemning the expansion of Heathrow, and received criticism for claiming that Greenpeace had become a cheerleading wing of the Conservative Party. Emily Thornberry previously promised environmental campaigners that she was opposed to Heathrow expansion, and has posed for pictures with the Greenpeace 'Stop Heathrow Expansion Tour'. Islington Liberal Democrats have branded Ms. Thornberry a "hypocrite" for failing to live up to these promises when it actually came to voting in the House of Commons - two separate times. Jeremy Corbyn, Labour MP for Islington North, voted against airport expansion in London on both occasions. Councillor Greg Foxsmith, Islington Council's environment chief, who works with the 2M Group of Councils opposed to airport expansion, said: "The Environmental movement in Islington must be getting sick of Emily Thornberry. She is happy to pose for photographs with Greenpeace, but when it comes to voting in Parliament she is suddenly nowhere to be found. "People from across the political spectrum have worked together to stop airport expansion in London. The decision will have a direct impact on Islington in terms of noise - we're right under the flight path. "Once again, Ms. Thornberry has proved a big disappointment. She says one thing but refuses to put it into practice when it comes to the vote. That's simply hypocrisy." Text of motion: Points of Order - Airport Expansion (Parliamentary Approval) - 24 Feb 2009 at 16:39 That leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the Planning Act 2008 to require parliamentary approval for proposals for the building of new major airports and additional runways at existing major airports; and for connected purposes. Question put (Standing Order No. 23). The House divided: Ayes 247, Noes 203. Details of the vote can be seen online at: http://www.publicwhip.org.uk/division.php?date=2009-02-24&number=38
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Thu 12th Nov 2009: A statement regarding Emily Thornberry. Fri 14th Aug 2009: Emily Thornberry's Attendance Record . Fri 17th Jul 2009: Labour MP Emily Thornberry ignores Asperger's victim's bid to beat extradition. Fri 10th Jul 2009: Bridget Fox condemns Thornberry 10p tax vote as a stab in the back for Islington's low-paid workers. Thu 7th May 2009: Local Labour MP Emily Thornberry betrays war veterans in historic Gurkha vote . Wed 8th Apr 2009: Lib Dems demand action to clean up Parliament: Emily Thornberry is "part of the problem". Thu 29th Jan 2009: Hypocritical Labour MP Emily Thornberry bails out of aeroplanes vote . Fri 24th Oct 2008: Irresponsible MP Emily Thornberry slammed over road safety record . Thu 31st Jul 2008: Labour MP Emily Thornberry sides with phone giants against local communities. Sat 5th Jul 2008: Labour MP Emily Thornberry votes herself 7% payrise, with no external audit. Wed 16th Jan 2008: Emily Thornberry Forced to Pay £4250 for Breaking Rules . Tue 30th Oct 2007: Hey Big Spender: Emily Thornberry leads the way. Wed 28th Jun 2006: Emily Thornberry MP "unwise" - - Parliamentary Standards Committee . Wed 15th Mar 2006: EMILY THORNBERRY MP "DOCTORED" ELECTORAL COMMISSION NEWS RELEASE. Published and promoted by Dominic Mathon on behalf of the Liberal Democrats both at 3N Leroy House, 436 Essex Rd N1 3QP. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |