Islington Liberal Democrats - Working with you - all year round

ISLINGTON LODGES OBJECTION TO CONGESTION ZONE EXPANSION

12.07.37pm BST (GMT +0100) Mon 8th Aug 2005

Islington's Lib Dem Council has voiced it's strong objection to the proposed Congestion Zone Extension in it's official response to stage 2 of Transport for London's Congestion Zone Western Extension.

The Council is deeply concerned that the extension to the zone would actually increase traffic in parts of the borough, that the new discount zone for residents would be unfair, and that it would create more pressure on the already overcrowded public transport through the area.

Cllr Bridget Fox, Executive Member for Sustainability, says: "We are continuing our objection to these plans, which we believe could have a huge impact on residents. Any proposal that would lead to deterioration in traffic conditions within Central London is unacceptable to the Council.

"If they do go ahead with the extension, we want commitments from TfL to fund improvements to public transport in the area and to tackle the rat running on residential streets it may cause.

"We believe that alternative schemes such as improved bus services, the East London Line Extension, and an extension of the Cross River Tram would be far better for Islington and Inner London, and will continue to lobby TfL to drop the extension and focus on these measures instead."

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Previous news story: FOX SLAMS TUBE FAILURES (Mon 8th Aug 2005).
Next news story: Recycling in Islington now better than most Councils in London (Wed 10th Aug 2005).

Related News Stories:

Tue 20th Jan 2009:

Sat 1st Mar 2008:

Mon 24th Nov 2003:

Sat 24th Feb 2001:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
Published and promoted by Dominic Mathon on behalf of the Liberal Democrats both at 3N Leroy House, 436 Essex Rd N1 3QP.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.