Islington Liberal Democrats - Working with you - all year round

Bridget Fox Calls on Government to Meet Lib Dem Chewing Gum Challenge

5.05.56pm GMT Thu 17th Feb 2005

Bridget Fox calls on Government to meet Lib Dems' Chewing Gum Challenge.

Bridget says, "Like much of London, Islington faces a sticky situation with chewing gum. Historic York Stone and clean new pavements alike are blighted by gum selfishly left by thousands of people every year. It is totally unnecessary yet it's blighting the borough."

Liberal Democrats at the GLA have consulted other boroughs and discovered that London's Councils are spending an estimated total £2.3million of public money in cleaning up chewing gum alone. Meanwhile, costs incurred by London Underground's attempts to remove discarded gum from tube stations and trains reach a further £2million.

Bridget says "These millions could be much better spent on improving the environment, instead we are subsidising the gum-droppers. I want the Government to take a tough line with the gum manufacturers by making them pay a 'penny per pack' sold, which would go directly to local authorities to help pay for clear-up costs."

Other suggestions from the Lib Dem GLA team include: financial incentives to develop biodegradable gum consumer awareness campaigns and printing larger messages on packages to encourage responsible disposal.

Bookmark this story at: del.icio.usdel.icio.us DiggDigg FacebookFacebook LibDigLibDig redditreddit StumbleUponStumbleUpon
Print this news story.
Previous news story: The Hole That Cost a Mint -Story Update (Thu 17th Feb 2005).
Next news story: Residents Benefit from End of Labour Loan (Fri 18th Feb 2005).

Related News Stories:

Tue 23rd Mar 2010:

Mon 19th Jan 2009:

Sun 14th Sep 2008:

Mon 7th Mar 2005:

Mon 10th Jan 2005:

Printed and hosted by Prater Raines Ltd, 98 Sandgate High Street, Folkestone CT20 3BY.
Published and promoted by Islington Liberal Democrats on behalf of the Liberal Democrats both at 238 Caledonian Rd, London, N1 0NG.
The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider.